[Esd-l] Problem with unmangling attachments

John D. Hardin jhardin at impsec.org
Tue Jun 4 08:39:01 PDT 2002

On Mon, 3 Jun 2002, Eric Kwant wrote:

> 2. Or is it just poisoned attachments that the sanitizer reacts
> this way too, and regular (?) defanged attachments are not
> severely disabled like this?

It is just poisoned attachments that are mangled in this manner.

MANGLE = change attachment filename
POISON = change MIME header so attachment requires work to retrieve
QUARANTINE = save poisoned message rather than delivering

Does that clarify it any?

 John Hardin KA7OHZ    ICQ#15735746    http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
 jhardin at impsec.org                        pgpk -a jhardin at impsec.org
  768: 0x41EA94F5 - A3 0C 5B C2 EF 0D 2C E5  E9 BF C8 33 A7 A9 CE 76 
 1024: 0xB8732E79 - 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C  AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
 "To disable the Internet to save EMI and Disney is the moral
  equivalent of burning down the library of Alexandria to ensure the
  livelihood of monastic scribes."
                                    -- John Ippolito of the Guggenheim
   353 days until The Matrix Reloaded

More information about the esd-l mailing list