[Esd-l] Alternatives to Sanitizer

John D. Hardin jhardin at impsec.org
Sat Jul 20 21:04:00 PDT 2002

On Thu, 18 Jul 2002, Graham Dunn wrote:

> Mimedefang itself is a very basic filtering tool, but provides a
> very powerful framework to plug things like spammassassin / Anomy
> into it (has there ever been any work on getting the sanitizer
> into the mimedefang framework?).

No, there hasn't.
> Plusses:
> o	runs as a milter, so multiple sendmails per message (in
> gateway configuration) is avoided, lowering overhead.

That's a pretty big plus.

> Minuses:
> o     runs as a milter, so sendmail only (if you're not a sendmail
> shop).

That's a pretty big minus. I like being MTA-agnostic. I also like the
configuration flexibility that procmail provides.

 John Hardin KA7OHZ    ICQ#15735746    http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
 jhardin at impsec.org                        pgpk -a jhardin at impsec.org
  768: 0x41EA94F5 - A3 0C 5B C2 EF 0D 2C E5  E9 BF C8 33 A7 A9 CE 76 
 1024: 0xB8732E79 - 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C  AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
  ...the Fates notice those who buy chainsaws...
                                              -- www.darwinawards.com
   307 days until The Matrix Reloaded

More information about the esd-l mailing list