[Esd-l] Need to bypass Sanitizer

[John D. Hardin]

On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, Paul Thomas wrote:

> Is there a real point or purpose to "double extension" filenames?
> If not, getting the person who uses them to use single filenames
> might be my best option. If there is a legitimate reason for
> "double extension"s, I might want to make a separate poisoned list
> that doesn't include them for this situation.

Good question. Most of the really bad extensions are completely
poisoned.

They're important if you're not poisoning *.exe, for example.

--
 John Hardin KA7OHZ    ICQ#15735746    http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
 jhardin at impsec.org                       pgpk -a jhardin at wolfenet.com
  768: 0x41EA94F5 - A3 0C 5B C2 EF 0D 2C E5  E9 BF C8 33 A7 A9 CE 76 
 1024: 0xB8732E79 - 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C  AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
 "They [media giants] have no idea how to do business with resourceful
  human beings rather than passive vegetables. So they run to [the]
  government for protection."
                    -- Doc Searls on the SSSCA, in Linux Journal
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
   928 days until the Presidential Election