[Esd-l] Procmail warning message

[John D. Hardin]

On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, Peter Hanecak wrote:

> > > procmail: Extraneous deliver-head flag ignored
> >
> > Cosmetic bug. Fixed in 1.135
> 
> btw, what was the cause and appropriate step(s) to fix it? I
> updated sanitizer to 1.135 but I'm still seeing "procmail:
> Extraneous filter-flag ignored" in logfile so it looks like there
> is maby same "cosmetic bug" in my own procmail rules.

"extraneous filter-flag" is probably a different problem, but this one
was caused by putting the "h" flag on a rule that does not deliver,
e.g.:

    :0 h
    ^fnord:
    {
       VAR=whatever
    }

I think yours will be something similar. The "filter" flag is
probably on a rule whose action is not a filter command.

--
 John Hardin KA7OHZ    ICQ#15735746    http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
 jhardin at impsec.org                        pgpk -a jhardin at impsec.org
  768: 0x41EA94F5 - A3 0C 5B C2 EF 0D 2C E5  E9 BF C8 33 A7 A9 CE 76 
 1024: 0xB8732E79 - 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C  AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
 "To disable the Internet to save EMI and Disney is the moral
  equivalent of burning down the library of Alexandria to ensure the
  livelihood of monastic scribes."
                                    -- John Ippolito of the Guggenheim
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
   351 days until The Matrix Reloaded