[Esd-l] Problem with unmangling attachments

Eric Kwant eric at kwantum.net
Tue Jun 4 09:33:01 PDT 2002


Excellent! Yes, that clarifies it. Thank you.



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John D. Hardin" <jhardin at impsec.org>
To: "Eric Kwant" <eric at kwantum.net>
Cc: <Esd-l at spconnect.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 8:35 AM
Subject: Re: [Esd-l] Problem with unmangling attachments


> On Mon, 3 Jun 2002, Eric Kwant wrote:
> 
> > 2. Or is it just poisoned attachments that the sanitizer reacts
> > this way too, and regular (?) defanged attachments are not
> > severely disabled like this?
> 
> It is just poisoned attachments that are mangled in this manner.
> 
> MANGLE = change attachment filename
> POISON = change MIME header so attachment requires work to retrieve
> QUARANTINE = save poisoned message rather than delivering
> 
> Does that clarify it any?
> 
> --
>  John Hardin KA7OHZ    ICQ#15735746    http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
>  jhardin at impsec.org                        pgpk -a jhardin at impsec.org
>   768: 0x41EA94F5 - A3 0C 5B C2 EF 0D 2C E5  E9 BF C8 33 A7 A9 CE 76 
>  1024: 0xB8732E79 - 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C  AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>  "To disable the Internet to save EMI and Disney is the moral
>   equivalent of burning down the library of Alexandria to ensure the
>   livelihood of monastic scribes."
>                                     -- John Ippolito of the Guggenheim
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>    353 days until The Matrix Reloaded



More information about the esd-l mailing list