SpamAssassin running before Sanitizer rules (was Re:
[Esd-l] Properly posted question per your requirements)
scott at dctchambers.com
Thu Jun 26 09:40:16 PDT 2003
At 08:27 06/26/03, you wrote:
<looks fine to me>
>* < 256000
* < 256000
Do you have a ".procmailrc" file in the user's $HOME?
> >>ii) Mail Server (name and version, ie: Sendmail V8.8.8)
grep sendmail.cf for "spam", "proc" and "Mlocal" entries
> > iii) other software you are using including versions and setup
>spamassassin 2.31, sanitizer 1.136
You might find the SpamAssassin 2.4x set a little more stable, and keeping
current with the sanitizer is always a good idea.
The older versions of SpamAssassin handled local mail delivery, that may be
part of your problem. Newer versions handle thing a little differently,
though I don't know which version they made the switch. There are some
major differences in the 2.5 set and may not work with some Linux distro's
and older versions, with out a lot of messing around with libs etc.
What makes you think SpamAssassin is running ahead of the Sanitizer rules,
in the first place?
> >> 3.) Don't top post, like I just did, and clean up irrelevant text.
>what is "top post"
As apposed to chronological, inline posting.
> > 1.) Start your own thread
Guess I should have included "with a meaningful subject" on that line.
More information about the esd-l