[Esd-l] Holy cow!

Scott Wiersdorf scott at perlcode.org
Tue Nov 5 12:16:00 PST 2002

On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 01:20:58PM -0600, Brad Wyman wrote:
> actualy i did get a lot of "Holy cow man" stuff that got caught by
> spamassassin befor it even got to the sanitizer. i rearly run anything
> marked as spam threw sanitiser, trying to save cpu time i "quarantine" it
>  then later check for non spam and just dump it

I run that in the reverse order: sanitizer first, then SA.
Sanitizer/procmail is _far_ more efficient CPU-wise than SA/perl.
Don't try shoving a 300k msg through SA, btw, unless you've got a
*lightly* loaded server.

Scott Wiersdorf
scott at perlcode.org

More information about the esd-l mailing list