[Esd-l] Procmail warning message

John D. Hardin jhardin at impsec.org
Thu Jun 6 21:06:08 PDT 2002

On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, Peter Hanecak wrote:

> > > procmail: Extraneous deliver-head flag ignored
> >
> > Cosmetic bug. Fixed in 1.135
> btw, what was the cause and appropriate step(s) to fix it? I
> updated sanitizer to 1.135 but I'm still seeing "procmail:
> Extraneous filter-flag ignored" in logfile so it looks like there
> is maby same "cosmetic bug" in my own procmail rules.

"extraneous filter-flag" is probably a different problem, but this one
was caused by putting the "h" flag on a rule that does not deliver,

    :0 h

I think yours will be something similar. The "filter" flag is
probably on a rule whose action is not a filter command.

 John Hardin KA7OHZ    ICQ#15735746    http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
 jhardin at impsec.org                        pgpk -a jhardin at impsec.org
  768: 0x41EA94F5 - A3 0C 5B C2 EF 0D 2C E5  E9 BF C8 33 A7 A9 CE 76 
 1024: 0xB8732E79 - 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C  AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
 "To disable the Internet to save EMI and Disney is the moral
  equivalent of burning down the library of Alexandria to ensure the
  livelihood of monastic scribes."
                                    -- John Ippolito of the Guggenheim
   351 days until The Matrix Reloaded

More information about the esd-l mailing list