[Esd-l] Sanitizer works for all except a few
crothbauer at intagio.com
Tue Jul 16 08:30:07 PDT 2002
Good thought but I should have stated...
5 of the 6 other test users have /bin/false for their shells. They are
From: Mark_Saunders [mailto:Mark_Saunders at piucorp.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 10:20 AM
To: Chris Rothbauer
Cc: esd-l at spconnect.com
Subject: Re: [Esd-l] Sanitizer works for all except a few
If I'm not mistaken, if the shell is /bin/false, procmail won't take
action for that user. Could someone confirm this?
Chris Rothbauer wrote:
> I just installed procmail and sanitizer to strip all unwanted
> attachments from inbound email. Very nice tool, by the way. I have it
> working across my initial test group except for two people (about a
> 25% failure rate). We use Outlook 2000 client against Solaris 2.6,
> Sendmail 8.11.6, procmail 3.15.2, and Sanitizer 1.135.
> The two who received "stripped" files (outlook strips them) have
> different shells (/bin/false, and /bin/bash), don't have .forward
> files or .procmailrc files, and I have removed their .profile and
> .bashrc files.
> The log entries for my procmail.log (mine works) and theirs are
> I am running out of ideas. Any thoughts on where I can look?
> Esd-l mailing list
> Esd-l at spconnect.com http://www.spconnect.com/mailman/listinfo/esd-l
mv $win /dev/null
More information about the esd-l