[Esd-l] Stripping Attachments?

John D. Hardin jhardin at impsec.org
Mon Jan 14 06:40:27 PST 2002

On Sun, 13 Jan 2002, Paul Thomas wrote:

> So then to strip alot of file extentions, but allow eml files and
> have them mangled, I should exclude .eml from /etc/procmail/stripped
> rather than from MANGLE_EXTENSIONS?

eml would be in MANGLE but not in strip.
> > Sorry, I wasn't clear. If the EML attachmetn itself has any
> > attachments, they won't be sanitized.
> Even if the .eml is mangled?


> I guess my above mangling question applies here also. But, are you
> saying if a .rtf file comes along, the Sanitizer checks to see if
> it is really a .DOC format then does the macro scan (if enabled)
> but if it fails to be a .DOC, goes ahead and mangles according to


 John Hardin KA7OHZ    ICQ#15735746    http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
 jhardin at impsec.org                       pgpk -a jhardin at wolfenet.com
  768: 0x41EA94F5 - A3 0C 5B C2 EF 0D 2C E5  E9 BF C8 33 A7 A9 CE 76 
 1024: 0xB8732E79 - 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C  AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
  Monty Python's Star Trek Voyager:
  A successful trans-warp experiment turns Paris and Janeway into
  newts, but they get better.
  ...wait a minute... It's already been done...
   5 days until Babylon 5: the Legend of the Rangers

More information about the esd-l mailing list