[Esa-l] Double Extensions fails

Dave Clendenan dave at monty.bc.ca
Wed Feb 14 07:13:21 PST 2001

It still looks to me like blocking double extensions will
trap 'filename.date.extension'

This would cause various problems here, is there any way
of narrowing the scope of what gets blocked.

I'm thinking a second list of  extensions, that would be 
checked against the first of a pair of extensions, if the
second was one to be mangled.

so it'd block 'file.jpg.exe' and 'file.bat.exe' but not 
'file.feb3.doc'   Can you see a cleaner way of having this
type of test?


More information about the esd-l mailing list