[Esa-l] Double Extensions fails

John D. Hardin jhardin at wolfenet.com
Wed Feb 14 06:55:58 PST 2001

On Wed, 14 Feb 2001, Michael Meltzer wrote:

> I don't understand why to block double extensions ? Is it not
> sufficient to block the (last) extension ?

Where you have a rule like *.VBS that's true. 

If, however, you are not poisoning *.EXE, then you need the
double-extension rule to catch things like EXPLOIT.TXT.EXE

 John Hardin KA7OHZ   ICQ#15735746   http://www.wolfenet.com/~jhardin/
 jhardin at wolfenet.com      pgpk -a finger://gonzo.wolfenet.com/jhardin
  768: 0x41EA94F5 - A3 0C 5B C2 EF 0D 2C E5  E9 BF C8 33 A7 A9 CE 76 
 1024: 0xB8732E79 - 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C  AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
  Failure to plan ahead on someone else's part does not constitute an
  emergency on my part.
                                  - David W. Barts in a.s.r
                                    <davidb at ce.washington.edu>
   108 days until Mir deorbits

More information about the esd-l mailing list