JS-Kit/Echo comments for article at http://smallestminority.blogspot.com/2010/02/quote-of-day.html (11 comments)

  Tentative mapping of comments to original article, corrections solicited.

jsid-1266008815-344  Mark Horning at Fri, 12 Feb 2010 21:06:55 +0000

Now see here.  That's only funny because it's true.


jsid-1266016074-590  Lyle at Fri, 12 Feb 2010 23:07:54 +0000

"...individualists with whom they enter mutually-beneficial economic agreements."
Is there some other definition of "friend"?


jsid-1266021334-849  Catherine Jefferson at Sat, 13 Feb 2010 00:35:35 +0000

Picking on the poor Randians, are you, Kevin?  ROFL!

Yes, Lyle, there is some other definition.  Quite a few, in fact.  You should get out more. ;)

jsid-1266023911-162  Adam at Sat, 13 Feb 2010 01:18:31 +0000 in reply to jsid-1266021334-849

Just out of curiosity - like what?

It's snark, sure. The statement is supposed to be sarcastic. But surely you receive some value from a friend, or else there's very little to differentiate that relationship from a normal acquaintance. That the value is economic in nature does not suggest it is monetary, material, or even tangible - only that there's an exchange of values. Agreements need not be contractual.

I'm not being argumentative - I'm genuinely curious as to what other definition you could apply.


jsid-1266022755-349  Mark Horning at Sat, 13 Feb 2010 00:59:15 +0000

I suspect Lyle is the type of person I would like to enter a mutually-benificial economic agreement with.


jsid-1266037462-743  Rob at Sat, 13 Feb 2010 05:04:29 +0000

The quote leads me believe that they have not read Atlas Shrugged.  Francisco and Hank were friends because they see value in each other for the person that the other is in life and work.

How else would one value a friend, what you can extort from them?  What you give them as an act of worship?

Which type of friendship is real and which is a business relationship again???


jsid-1266086795-668  Greg Hunt at Sat, 13 Feb 2010 18:46:35 +0000

...or you could just say... "other people with character."


jsid-1266109692-495  LabRat at Sun, 14 Feb 2010 01:08:12 +0000

I would be a lot fonder of Objectivism if there weren't so irritatingly many Objectivists who seem to be into it not so much out of a love for sweet reason, but because they have found a philosophical justification to be an asshole.

jsid-1266111940-848  Greg Hunt at Sun, 14 Feb 2010 01:45:40 +0000 in reply to jsid-1266109692-495

Now that's funny right there, I don't care who you are.


jsid-1266158133-373  Retardo at Sun, 14 Feb 2010 14:35:33 +0000

My only problem with Objectivists is that when I invoice them for the time I spend listening to their ideas, they never pay up. 


jsid-1266347115-325  Catherine Jefferson at Tue, 16 Feb 2010 19:05:15 +0000

| I would be a lot fonder of Objectivism if there weren't so irritatingly many Objectivists who seem
| to be into it not so much out of a love for sweet reason, but because they have found a
| philosophical justification to be an asshole.

ROFL!  I've met some of those. :)


 Note: All avatars and any images or other media embedded in comments were hosted on the JS-Kit website and have been lost; references to haloscan comments have been partially automatically remapped, but accuracy is not guaranteed and corrections are solicited.
 If you notice any problems with this page or wish to have your home page link updated, please contact John Hardin <jhardin@impsec.org>