LabRat pretty much chewed all the meat off those liberal bones. Must be difficult going through life knowing that everything your beliefs are based on lies. Of course that presupposes that liberals know the difference between lies and facts. And from what I've seen over the years they mostly don't.
But the reaction to this utterly proves my point: the same rules (at least 357 at this point) that apply to me don't apply to the rest of you.
Just since we've learned our lesson. please define
* reaction
* utterly (hint, nothing to do with milk)
* proves
* point
* apply
* me
* that
that apply to me don't apply to the rest of you.
They do, and they don't.
They do, insofar as for most of us here, it is presumed that we're being honest and are able to defend positions. That we've thought through before we've spoken. That we've got some basis of history to relate to, that we're capable of understanding each other, and that we're not emotionally driven.
You've proven quite otherwise. Witness what mikeb302000 is discovering:
http://www.haloscan.com/comments/khbaker/2752611867551464407/
Witness also the similarity in your and his arguments. But - at least for now - he's getting the benefit of the doubt.
You took the benefit of the doubts we've extended you, pissed on them, shit on that, tossed some korans on them, set those on fire, and danced around that listening to Celine Dion.
You can't see that you're ridiculed because you've demonstrated an inability, and until you make good on some parts of those lacks you've demonstrated, it will be presumed that you're still failing.
But no, the rules really aren't different. But you've destroyed your credibility, thus if you actually want to convince us, you've got a far higher bar to cross. And even then, you'll need to deal with a number of your previous WTF-he's-not-that-stupid-holy-hell-he-is comments. Which you've proven, repeatedly, unwilling to learn enough to do.
Markadelphia, I used the same rules on Sarah's argument about Protestantism as a necessary prerequisite to capitalism as to any of your belief-based rants. You don't think those rules apply to others because most of the others posting here don't make the same mistakes as you. And how ironic that a teacher just never seems to learn.
Damn. I needed to include a much more pointed "no see it's not remotely me it's just like YOU because I said so" section.
Note:
All avatars and any images or other media embedded in comments were hosted on the JS-Kit website and have been lost;
references to haloscan comments have been partially automatically remapped, but accuracy is not guaranteed and corrections are solicited.
If you notice any problems with this page or wish to have your home page link updated, please contact John Hardin <jhardin@impsec.org>
JS-Kit/Echo comments for article at http://smallestminority.blogspot.com/2009/06/quote-of-day_09.html (15 comments)
Tentative mapping of comments to original article, corrections solicited.
Indeed. RTWT. Heh.
Great job, LabRat.
OH that is excellent! And Oh so true!!!
I love the smell of charred idiot in the morning, it smells of ... victory.
Hey, that was a LawDog-worthy rant rat-there.
LabRat pretty much chewed all the meat off those liberal bones. Must be difficult going through life knowing that everything your beliefs are based on lies. Of course that presupposes that liberals know the difference between lies and facts. And from what I've seen over the years they mostly don't.
I believe utterly that Obama will make mistakes.
And last I checked, it's the leftists who all support the "diversity" of female genital mutilation in the Mid-east.
(Granted, almost everyone in America supports mild male genital mutilation. *shrug*)
Ok, tangent off. Good rant, LabRat. :D
Where was the fuckin' pony?
And what color was it?
It might be more funny if it wasn't such a complete
mischaracterization of me. And of many of you which is hilarious.
But the reaction to this utterly proves my point: the same rules (at least 357 at this point) that apply to me don't apply to the rest of you.
But the reaction to this utterly proves my point: the same rules (at least 357 at this point) that apply to me don't apply to the rest of you.
Just since we've learned our lesson. please define
* reaction
* utterly (hint, nothing to do with milk)
* proves
* point
* apply
* me
* that
that apply to me don't apply to the rest of you.
They do, and they don't.
They do, insofar as for most of us here, it is presumed that we're being honest and are able to defend positions. That we've thought through before we've spoken. That we've got some basis of history to relate to, that we're capable of understanding each other, and that we're not emotionally driven.
You've proven quite otherwise. Witness what mikeb302000 is discovering:
http://www.haloscan.com/comments/khbaker/2752611867551464407/
Witness also the similarity in your and his arguments. But - at least for now - he's getting the benefit of the doubt.
You took the benefit of the doubts we've extended you, pissed on them, shit on that, tossed some korans on them, set those on fire, and danced around that listening to Celine Dion.
You can't see that you're ridiculed because you've demonstrated an inability, and until you make good on some parts of those lacks you've demonstrated, it will be presumed that you're still failing.
But no, the rules really aren't different. But you've destroyed your credibility, thus if you actually want to convince us, you've got a far higher bar to cross. And even then, you'll need to deal with a number of your previous WTF-he's-not-that-stupid-holy-hell-he-is comments. Which you've proven, repeatedly, unwilling to learn enough to do.
Markadelphia, I used the same rules on Sarah's argument about Protestantism as a necessary prerequisite to capitalism as to any of your belief-based rants. You don't think those rules apply to others because most of the others posting here don't make the same mistakes as you. And how ironic that a teacher just never seems to learn.
Just for the record Kevin, I think this QotD should be enshrined on the left sidebar.
I may do that, GoF, I just may.
"It might be more funny if it wasn't such a complete
mischaracterization of me. And of many of you which is hilarious.
But the reaction to this utterly proves my point: the same rules (at least 357 at this point) that apply to me don't apply to the rest of you.
"
... which explains everything I ever need to know about Markadelpia. To quote Bugs Bunny, "What a maroon"!
Damn. I needed to include a much more pointed "no see it's not remotely me it's just like YOU because I said so" section.
Note: All avatars and any images or other media embedded in comments were hosted on the JS-Kit website and have been lost; references to haloscan comments have been partially automatically remapped, but accuracy is not guaranteed and corrections are solicited.
If you notice any problems with this page or wish to have your home page link updated, please contact John Hardin <jhardin@impsec.org>