[Esd-l] Holy cow!

[Kenneth Porter]

--On Tuesday, November 05, 2002 1:15 PM -0700 Scott Wiersdorf
<scott at perlcode.org> wrote:

> Sanitizer/procmail is _far_ more efficient CPU-wise than SA/perl.
> Don't try shoving a 300k msg through SA, btw, unless you've got a
> *lightly* loaded server.

If the server is NOT lightly loaded, why would one NOT run spamc/spamd (to
save the Perl process per-message startup cost) and get the bonus benefit
of its size limit?