[Esa-l] New funtionality for sanitizer
Murray L. Crane
mcrane at longbridge.com
Tue Dec 5 04:17:59 PST 2000
Was Re: Felix Navidad ... Stripping Attachments. Figured that a new
subject that was more on thread was required.
At 00:43 5/12/00 -0500, Patrick wrote:
> > allow *.doc, *.xls, *.zip, *.html, *.txt
> > mangle/strip/poison everything else
>Great, I didn't know you were implementing that function. This will
>make my life much easier!
That's the point of the new functionality that John has proposed. If you
want to operate in a "that which is not explicitly allowed is denied" way,
you can. It will be equally easy for me to operate in "that which is not
explicitly denied is allowed" mode, since that's how I have to run things here.
As Bjarni mentioned a few days back, just because a message has an
attachment that you don't want to let in doesn't mean the message shouldn't
be let in. That's all my post was pointing out, with a suggestion for some
additional/alternative functionality in the new scheme.
Stripping (with and without boilerplating as necessary) would be more
preferable to my lUsers than poisoning (which they currently have) because
some of our "customers" don't have the intelligence to give files sensible
Longbridge International Plc
| Longbridge International Plc
| Tel: +44 171 208 5858; Fax: +44 171 208 5859
| 85 Gracechurch Street, London EC3V 0AA, UK
| Visit our website at <http://www.longbridge.com/>http://www.longbridge.com/
More information about the esd-l